WANTED: Pabulum, Pandering, and NO QUESTIONS
Sunday’s Daily Times provided one of the most disturbing editorials I have read in a long time. Tom Claybaugh, Susan Parker, et al, have the chutzpah to rip their shirts and lament low voter turnout in city elections and then turn right around and call on candidates to shovel sh## rather than talk about real issues:
We do not want to hear anything from any candidate about what someone else has done or failed to do, might do, has said, really meant instead of did say or, worst of all, is thinking or intending to do.
It’s little wonder voters are so disengaged.
Voters don’t vote because they feel that little or nothing will change. Yes, there is a certain amount of civic disengagement; but ultimately people will turn out IF they feel that their vote means something.
Jim Ireton has had almost four years to accomplish something, yet the Daily Times won’t examine his record and doesn’t want candidates OR citizens questioning it. When Ireton announced his run for re-election he claimed that he had kept his promises. At the top of his list – not increasing taxes. Where is the front page expose on the FACT that Ireton not only proposed a tax hike, he tried to veto the FY 2013 budget BECAUSE it didn’t include his tax hike? and … The list goes on.
DT readers, and all other Salisbury citizens, deserve a newspaper that asks ALL CANDIDATES tough question. Candidates need to ask tough questions about their respective opponents’ records and proposals. Citizens should do the same. Unfortunately, Claybaugh & Co. simply want to feed voters pabulum about their chosen candidates, pander to the lowest common denominator, and most importantly – avoid asking their favored few any TOUGH QUESTIONS.
Let’s hope the reporting side of the shop didn’t get the memo.